If you're wondering how medical students in 2001 perceive rural practice, here are a few comments heard at a recent FMIG meeting at UW that featured a panel discussion talking about specialty choice -
One M-1 reported that a specialist told him that "all you do is wipe kids noses in a rural area"
You're not really doing real medicine in a rural area
You don't need a knowledgable physician in a rural area - they just transfer the patients to the city anyway
I might lose my aggressive, high tech edge if I moved to a rural area
I'm forwarding these comments so that we can be thinking about responses to these perceptions as we plan recruitment fairs and special events for students. What would you say to these students? If you email the group list with your thoughts, I can collect them for a report at our April 4 Statewide RTT meeting.
Carrol C
I have lots of ready answers to these questions based on my opinion. It would be quite helpful to have refernce DATA to back up our answers. I'll put my "answers" below in ALL CAPS. Can anyone lay hands on relavent data?
Louis Sanner, MD
Residency Director
Madison Family Practice Residency
608-263-1731
One M-1 reported that a specialist told him that "all you do is wipe kids noses in a rural area"
RIDICULOUS. RURAL PRACTICE IS INHERENTLY MORE FULL RANGE THAN URBAN/SUBURBAN PRACTICE BECAUSE THERE IS MUCH LESS TENDENCY FOR PATIENTS TO SELF-REFER TO SPECIALISTS (TOO FAR AWAY) OR GO TO URGENT CARE CENTERS (MOSTLY DON'T EXIST IN RURAL AREAS). MOST RURAL PATIENTS THINK ABOUT SEEING "THE DOCTOR" FOR WHATEVER PROBLEMS THEY HAVE - NOT A PARTICULAR KIND OF DOCTOR.
You're not really doing real medicine in a rural area
UNSURE WHAT IS MEANT BY "REAL" HERE. IF "REAL" MENAS CUTTING EDGE EVIDENCE BASED COGNITIVE PRACTICE THAN ACCESS TO INFORMATION IS JUST AS AVAILABLE IN RURAL AS URBAN AREAS THANKS TO THE INTERNET, ETC. IF REAL IS HIGH TECH PROCEDURES THEN RURAL FPS TEND TO DO MORE PROCEDURES THAN THEIR URBAN COLLEAGUES - THE QUALITY OF THEIR EQUIPMENT DEPENDS ON PRACTICE FINANCIAL VIABILITY WHICH COVERS THE SAME RANGE IN RURAL SETTINGS AS URBAN.
You don't need a knowledgable physician in a rural area - they just transfer the patients to the city anyway
YOU NEED TO BE AT LEAST AS KNOWLEDGABLE - PATIENTS DON'T WANT TO TRAVEL LONG DISTANCES OR BE AWAY FROM HOME AND COMMUNITY. I THINK ALL PHYSICIANS MUST BE "KNOWLEDGABLE" REGARDLESS OF SETTING. YOU CAN MAKE MISTAKES, NOT CONSIDER RELAVENT DIAGNOSES, ETC. JUST AS EASILY WHEN PRACTICING NEXT DOOR TO A TERTIARY CENTER AS WHEN PRACTICING IN REMOTE AREAS AND HAVE JUST AS BAD AN IMPACT ON YOUR PATIENT.
BECOMING LESS "AGGRESSIVE" OR EVEN LESS "HIGH TECH" IS PROBABLY A GOOD THING FOR MANY PHYSICIANS AND THEIR PATIENTS. WE NEED TO MAKE APPROPRIATE USE OF TECHNOLOGY AND NEW TREATMENTS AND REPLACE "AGGRESSIVE" WITH WORDS AND ATTITUDES LIKE "ATTENTIVE" AND "DEDICATED" AND MAYBE EVEN "WISE" AND "COMPASSIONATE".
I DON'T PERCEIVE RURAL PRACTICE AS CAUSING ANYONE TO LOSE THEIR EDGE - THE MOTIVATION CERTAINLY IS THERE FOR LIFELONG LEARNING. YOUR PATIENTS COUNT ON YOU. THEY ARE YOUR NEIGHBORS. THAT'S A VERY SUSTAINABLE MOTIVATION.
This really makes me livid. We will never dispell these myths by working
only with students interested in primary care and rural practice. In
additon, we need to educate all medical students so that when they are
eventually practicing in a different discipline and not in a rural
practice, they are knowledgeable and respectful of what primary care rural
physcians really do. And, more importanly, we need to start educating our
specialist, tertiary care center colleagues that they are dead wrong. How
about a grant that funds two weeks rotations of our academic specialist
colleagues to shadow and work with some of our finest rural colleagues?
This is probably the next best alternative to them experiencing first-hand
the work of a rural doctor, i.e personally developing a major,
life-threatening illness while traveling in a rural community and being at
the "mercy" of great rural physicians. There was an apocraphyl (sp?) story
at University of California, San Diego when I was there, that the dean
(name unmentioned) changed his phylosopy, language, and to some degree
program funding support when he experienced a major MI in a rural mountain
area and was coded, received thrombolytics, was stabilized and
air-transported to a tertiary care setting, all the while being attended to
by a family physician, aka "another LMD from the boonies." Undoubtedly a
life-changing experience but probably not a feasible plan on a large
organized scale!
Lee Vogel
I had applicants I interviewed this year in Baraboo who told me they were
told the same things at UW. They said internal medicine and surgery at UW
are the worst at family practice and rural doc bashing. I have been around
23 years practicing and teaching in southern wisconsin. I have seen this
attitude persist for all 23 years from University Hospital but never change.
Things have not changed with the referral process there either (personal
experience). The only way to change these myths is to let these limited care
subspecialists feel it through the pocketbook and/or feel repercussions for
their actions. The Dean of the Medical school and other leaders need to take
this stuff seriously. These comments should be investigated similar to a
sexual harrassment case. These allegations are untrue. They are usually
stated by people with NO rural or even private sector experience. People who
say these statements should be mandated to speak with the Dean or other
leaders about what they said. Federal grants and other funds should be cut
to medical schools who do not have certain numbers of graduating medical
students going into primary care.
Just to let people know, this week I had 2 people in with ruptured
diverticula requiring surgery and triple antibiotics, 2 eldery people in
with pneumonia, one in with urosepsis, took care of a pediatrician with
kidney stones, evaluated and sent someone to madison with a complete
placenta praevia who had bled (gave first dose of steroids here), ran a code
blue on someone who collapsed in the next hospital room, and saw patients in
the office all week. Tim Deering (3rd yr Baraboo family practice RTT
resident) helped with the hospital patient load, Stuart Hannah (1st yr
Baraboo resident)did the defibrillation on the successful code and Stuart
did a thoracentesis on another patient of mine. I don't think we have seen
one snotty nose to blot all week.
Learning Issues and Questions for Investigation
How does the hospital influence the rural economy? (Modification: question was added and used in the review)