See Ontario adaptation at http://ahsn2.largnet.on.ca/sworm/repprovplan.htm
International Electronic Journal at http://e-jrh.deakin.edu.au/Register/default.asp
Draft Wonca Working Party on Rural Health for Gender and Rural Practice
For other policies check this page of links
ENQUIRIES REGARDING THIS POLICY 5
SUMMARY 7
1. INTRODUCTION: 9
2. ADVANTAGES OF RURAL PRACTICE: 9
3. BARRIERS TO ENTERING RURAL PRACTICE: 10
4. RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF RURAL FAMILY PHYSICIANS: 11
5. UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION: 12
6. POSTGRADUATE VOCATIONAL TRAINING: 13
7. CONTINUING EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT: 14
8. HIGHER UNIVERSITY STUDIES: 15
9. FINANCIAL AND MATERIAL SUPPORT: 15
10. FAMILY AND SPOUSE SUPPORT: 16
11. NATIONAL SUPPORT: 16
12. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 17
REFERENCES: 21
Dr J Rourke - Canada
Dr I Anwar - Pakistan
Dr N Naidoo - South Africa
Dr H Rabinowitz - United States of America
Dr J McLeod - United Kingdom
Dr P Newbery - Canada
Professor Roger Strasser
Director
Monash University Centre for Rural Health
Locked Bag No 1
Moe Victoria 3825 Australia
Telephone: + 61 51 270 735
Facsimile: + 61 51 270 737
Internet:
roger.strasser@med.monash.edu.au
SUMMARY
The worldwide shortage of rural family doctors
contributes directly to the difficulties with providing adequate
medical care in rural and remote areas in both developed and less
developed countries. WONCA believes there is an urgent need to
implement strategies to improve rural health services around the
world. This will require sufficient numbers of skilled rural family
doctors to provide the necessary services. In order to achieve
this goal, WONCA recommends:
1. Increasing the number of medical students recruited from rural areas.
2 Substantial exposure to rural practice in the medical undergraduate curriculum.
3. Specific flexible, integrated and coordinated rural practice vocational training programs.
4. Specific tailored continuing education and professional development programs which meet the identified needs of rural family physicians.
5. Appropriate academic positions, professional development and financial support for rural doctor-teachers to encourage rural research and education.
6. Medical schools should take responsibility to educate appropriately skilled doctors to meet the needs of their general geographic region including underserved areas and should play a key role in providing regional support for health professionals and accessible tertiary health care.
7. Development of appropriate needs based and culturally sensitive rural health care resources with local community involvement, regional cooperation and government support.
8. Improved professional and personal/family conditions in rural practice to promote retention of rural doctors.
9. Development and implementation of national
rural health strategies with central government support.
Every rural practice is unique with
its own challenges and rewards. A variety of definitions is used
around the world depending on local context. In Australia, the
RACGP Faculty of Rural Medicine defines rural practice as medical
practice outside urban areas, where the location of the practice
obliges some general practitioners to have, or to acquire, procedural
and other skills not usually required in urban practice.
There continues to be a worldwide shortage
of family doctors (general practitioners) in rural and
remote areas, and in particular doctors with the necessary
skills and knowledge to work effectively and comfortably in these
areas. In less well developed countries the majority of the population
is located in rural areas that may lack basic health requirements
such as clean water, adequate food and shelter, and where at best
they have limited access to modern medical services. Developed
countries also have significant shortages of rural family doctors,
even in countries where there is an overall over supply of doctors.
People living in remote and rural communities
require the security of ready access to medical care at times
of serious illness or injury. In addition, doctors and hospitals
in rural communities are important to the local economic and social
fabric. Often the health status of special needs groups is worse
in rural than metropolitan areas. These include the poor, the
elderly, women and indigenous people. Establishment of family
doctor services supported by hospitals and other health
facilities provide the basis for developing primary health care
and health promotion programs.
It is well recognised that the provision
of medical services by broadly trained generalist family physicians
is more cost effective than a range of specialist practitioners
and others providing primary care. In addition, for developing
countries, improvements in health status and economic development
are closely linked. Consequently, it is important that all nations
adopt specific policies and programs aimed at improving rural
health services through increasing the numbers of broadly skilled
family physicians located in rural and remote areas.
Rural doctors identify a series of key
attractions of rural practice. First is the greater variety of
practice that often includes obstetrics, surgery, anaesthetics
and emergency medicine together with hospital access and care
of the acutely ill. Rural practitioners are much more likely to
be looking after individual patients for all of their medical
problems on a continuing basis and to be caring for other family
members. Thus comprehensive and continuing care are frequent realities
in the country.
For many rural doctors the second great
attraction of rural practice is the country environment and lifestyle
which is associated with a better family life in a good place
to raise children particularly in developed countries. Social
satisfactions of rural practice identified by rural doctors include
community standing and respect, coupled with a sense of belonging
to a stable community, and enjoyment of outdoor living with many
recreational opportunities. In short, rural practice can offer
considerable professional rewards and satisfactions coupled with
the attractions of significant social status away from the difficulties
of city living.
A number of attitudinal and perceptual
barriers have been identified as discouraging medical graduates
from entering rural practice. Some of these are misperceptions
and others have a basis in reality. The key misperception is that
rural practice is somehow "second class medical practice".
Most undergraduate medical students have a city background and
so have no personal experience of living and working in the country.
In addition, most of the senior teachers in medical schools have
an experience and view of medicine which sees teaching hospital
practice as the ideal. Consequently, they assume that medical
practice in rural areas without the same facilities and support
as teaching hospitals is of a lesser standard.
An important attitudinal problem is
that of "learned helplessness". The highest that many
new medical graduates aspire to in dealing with medical problems
is being able to assess to which specialist to refer the patient
. Consequently, it is a frightening prospect for them to contemplate
rural practice where they have to manage problems themselves without
immediate access to high technology medical facilities and specialists.
There are a number of other barriers
which add to the disincentives for new graduates contemplating
rural practice. These include the heavy workload and long hours
on call which are likely to continue while there is a shortage
of doctors in the country. A lack of infrastructure and regional
support is common to rural practice, especially in developing
countries. Also, the relative professional isolation, which provides
many challenges and rewards for rural doctors is seen as a negative
factor for many students and new graduates. Often this aspect
is over-emphasised within the context of urban-based training
rather than the development of individual knowledge and skills
required and organisational strategies to address rural health
needs.
As well as the professional disincentives
to rural practice, there are personal and family issues as well.
Rural practice, particularly in small communities, may be difficult
for the doctor's spouse. Often the spouse is treated differently
from other members of the community and may become personally
isolated. Employment for the spouse and education for the family
are often significant problems in rural practice. Arrangement
of locum relief to permit holidays and continuing education is
often a major difficulty.
Even for those students and recent medical
graduates who wish to enter rural practice, there are difficulties
in obtaining appropriate training and ongoing educational support.
Tailored training programs preparing medical graduates for rural
practice are relatively few . Once in rural practice not only
is continuing education difficult to arrange, but often proves
to be of limited value to practising rural doctors. Generally,
the knowledge and skills acquired through experience in rural
practice are not given due recognition. This limits the potential
for career development of doctors who choose to practice in country
areas.
Drawing all these factors together it
is not surprising that in the view of many undergraduates and
new medical graduates the professional and social advantages of
rural practice are overwhelmed by the disadvantages. In order
to overcome these problems there needs to be developed a series
of comprehensive strategies which address all the specific issues.
This policy document has been developed drawing on the experience
in many countries around the world and forms the framework for
a comprehensive strategy plan to improve the recruitment and retention
of rural family physicians.
The ultimate goal of this policy is
for there to be sufficient numbers of skilled doctors located
in rural and remote areas to meet the health service needs of
the people they serve. Although the primary focus of the policy
is on education and training for rural practice, this should be
seen in the wider context of recruitment to and retention of doctors
in rural practice. There is a need to establish an integrated
career pathway of education and training for rural practice, beginning
at the pre-undergraduate level and continuing through undergraduate
medical education to specific rural practice vocational training
followed by appropriate continuing and university graduate education,
practice structures and family supports.
Ultimately, recruitment to rural practice
will only increase when students and new medical graduates see
rural practice as a positive career option. The series of strategies
outlined in this document are intended to bring this about through
sensitising students to rural medicine early on and providing
appropriate clinical teaching in the latter part of the undergraduate
course and in the immediate postgraduate period.
Retention in rural practice is likely
to be improved through tailored continuing education and professional
development programs, and the opportunity to pursue university
higher education while remaining in rural practice.
In addition to education and training
issues, there are a number of other factors which require attention
in any program to improve recruitment and retention to rural practice.
Reasonable working conditions, including a balance between workload,
on call and free time, are essential. Reliable cross coverage
or locum relief is a fundamental issue. Also there needs to be
appropriate financial reward for the complexity of the services
provided and degree of clinical responsibility taken by the doctor.
Other financial aspects include additional costs of living in
rural communities with the need for transportation to larger centres
for continuing education and professional development. Providing
a good education for the doctor's children can be difficult and
costly.
Also, retention of rural doctors depends
greatly on the satisfaction of the physicians spouse and family.
Often the reasons for rural practitioners returning to the city
relate to spouse and family concerns. Consequently, these are
given specific attention in this policy document.
Experience around the world shows that
students from a rural origin are much more likely to enter rural
practice after graduation. In most current medical courses, the
proportion of students from a rural origin is significantly less
than the proportion of the population which lives in the country.
Clearly one important strategy for increasing the numbers of rural
doctors involves recruitment of more medical students from a rural
background.
In order for this to occur, secondary
students in rural areas need to be encouraged to consider medicine
as a career option and to apply for entry to medical school. Consequently
there is a need for specific programs which promote medicine to
rural secondary schools. In many rural areas the academic standards
of the secondary schools may not be sufficiently high for their
graduates to qualify for medical school entry. Thus, programs
need to be developed which identify potential medical students
and assist them with secondary education in preparation for medical
school entry.
In order to ensure an appropriate proportion
of rural origin students are recruited into medical schools, there
need to be specific mechanisms included in the selection process.
Criteria for selection based on marks plus other criteria are
evolving. Selection processes which include interview of
applicants and give recognition and credit for rural background
are to be encouraged. Specific targets for admission of students
from a rural background may be needed.
After a rural background the next strongest
factor associated with entering rural practice is undergraduate
and postgraduate clinical experience in a rural setting. Consequently,
rural exposure for all undergraduate medical students should be
maximised. Early positive exposure to rural practice will encourage
more students to develop an interest in rural practice as a career
option and foster a better understanding of rural practice for
others. All students should be introduced to rural health
issues early in the medical course and have clinical rotations
to rural hospitals and rural family practice later in the course.
As rural practitioners provide a wider
range of services than their metropolitan counterparts, rural
practice attachments provide students with the opportunity to
develop a breadth of clinical skills. These include diagnostic
and therapeutic procedural skills as well as skills of clinical
judgement and self reliance in the practice setting. This rural
experience also helps students identify their own learning needs.
In addition, students should be encouraged
to undertake optional attachments and electives in rural health,
ranging through rural hospital attachments, rural family practice
and other rural health services.
"Rural Practice Clubs" encourage
city origin students to develop an interest in rural practice
and support rural background students in adjusting to the challenges
of city living and university studies. Rural origin students would
be assisted further through rural doctor mentor schemes whereby
each student is attached to a physician practicing in the rural
town or area from which the student comes. The mentor provides
the student with ongoing personal support and encouragement as
well as a professional role model.
For students who indicate an early commitment
to rural practice then a "rural medicine stream" in
the medical school is recommended. This might take the form of
one to three years of the complete medical curriculum undertaken
in the rural setting, or a thread of rural attachments intertwined
through the clinical components of the curriculum.
Decentralised medical schools that allow
medical students to take a major part or all of their studies
at centres located outside major metropolitan areas, are more
likely to attract students from rural areas and be successful
in producing doctors to practice in rural areas.
The development of community based family medicine curricula in medical education should be encouraged, and should include significant rural content.
Medical schools should assume a responsibility
to educate appropriately trained doctors to meet the needs of
their general geographic region including underserved areas. As
well, they should play a key role in providing regional support
for health professionals and accessible tertiary heath care. The
inclusion of rural doctors as educators and researchers is integral
to the development of an improved understanding of and a supportive
attitude towards rural practice.
The development of undergraduate and
postgraduate education and training for rural practice is greatly
facilitated by the establishment of Rural Medical Education Centres.
These Centres should be established in rural areas with the aim
of co-ordinating undergraduate education, vocational training,
continuing education and university postgraduate studies for rural
doctors. An important function of these centres is to facilitate
the development of reciprocal links between rural hospitals/practices
and medical schools/teaching hospitals. The establishment of such
Centres provides the opportunity for rural family physicians to
be actively involved in teaching students and vocational trainees.
They also provide a focus for other academic developments including
rural health research.
Rural family physicians generally provide
a wider range of services than do their metropolitan counterparts.
Consequently, there is a need for specific residency training
programs for rural practice which prepare new medical graduates
for a career in the country.
Wherever possible, training for rural
practice should occur in the rural setting based at regional rural
hospitals and rural family practices. In addition to standard
training for family practice, rural practice vocational training
requires specific emphasis on: hands-on learning of procedural
skills; the spectrum of illnesses in rural and remote communities;
the sociology and psychology of rural and remote communities;
and professional and personal aspects of living and working in
small rural communities.
Training positions for advanced rural
practice skills in emergency medicine, anaesthesia, surgery, procedural
obstetrics and others, need to be developed and appropriately
funded. Depending on the intensity of the training program, such
training may involve one to two years of additional training
time over and above basic family medicine training.
Consideration should be given to recognition
for rural vocational training in the form of certification in
rural medicine. The opportunity to take some training in other
countries can broaden experience and help develop new approaches
to medical practice, medical education, and health care delivery.
Most rural practitioners experience
great difficulty in arranging locum relief to attend continuing
education activities. Often rural family physicians find that
when they do attend continuing education programs that they are
of little value to them as they are not pitched at the appropriate
level.
There is a need for specific tailored
continuing education and professional development programs to
meet the needs of rural family physicians. Generally these programs
should be developed by rural doctors for rural doctors. Rural
Medical Education Centres provide a very appropriate focus for
developing such continuing education programs.
These programs should recognise the
pre-existing knowledge and skills of rural family physicians which
have often been developed through dealing with clinical problems
in relative professional isolation, rather than through formal
training. The programs should be responsive to the specific learning
needs of the doctors which usually involves a focus that is practical,
case based and problem oriented. The aim of such continuing education
programs should be to empower the learner and thus extend and
expand the doctors knowledge and clinical skills.
Continuing education program should
also be accessible to rural practitioners which means locating
them in rural regional centres rather than major cities. Also,
the use of distance education methods to bring continuing education
to rural practitioners is to be encouraged. This includes not
only traditional published materials, but also the use of new
technologies including teleconferencing, electronic mail and satellite
television, and other developments in modern information technology.
Another important form of continuing
education and professional development is short term hands-on
clinical attachments in larger hospitals. These should be encouraged
and facilitated through liaison with the specialists in these
hospitals. Release from the practice maybe facilitated by rotating
locum relief schemes where a group of rural practices share a
rotating locum.
The opportunity to do sabbaticals or
exchanges in other countries can broaden experience for practicing
rural doctors and help develop new approaches to medical practice,
medical education, and health care delivery.
Currently there is no sense of career
progression for doctors who go into rural practice and those who
later wish to pursue an academic career are given little credit
for the knowledge and experience gained while practicing in the
country. There is a need to develop appropriate university postgraduate
diplomas and degrees which would provide a means for career progression
into education, research or administration. Also such graduate
studies programs would assist in creating a pool of academically
trained rural practitioners to staff Rural Medical Education Centres
and other rural health academic units.
For such postgraduate studies to be
of value to rural family physicians they must be offered by distance
education. The use of distance education allows rural doctors
to pursue higher studies while staying in their practices and
towns.
As mentioned previously, practice in
remote and rural areas has many financial disadvantages. In order
to recruit and retain doctors in remote and rural practice these
financial issues need to be addressed. This may take the form
of additional payment recognising the higher level of clinical
responsibility and services provided; specific incentive payments
for practicing in underserved areas; financial assistance with
accommodation, education and travel for the doctor and his/her
family; and so on.
Another form of material support is
the provision of premises and equipment for the medical practice.
Many rural communities provide such facilities to assist in attracting
doctors.
A physician is more likely to remain
long term in a rural practice where he or she is not the sole
provider of medical services. Consequently, two or three doctor
group practices are to be encouraged where necessary through direct
financial support so as to sustain the economic viability of the
practice. In order to provide effective primary health care, rural
doctors require the assistance of appropriately trained nurses
and other health professionals. Combining facilities for doctors
and other health professionals in rural community health centres
fosters cooperative health care delivery.
After a doctor, the next health service
priority for a rural community is a hospital which provides acute
medical, surgical, obstetrics and paediatric care. Many such hospitals
have been constructed and equipped with considerable financial
support from the local community. The hospital is important also
to the economy of the town as a major employer and purchaser of
goods and services within the community. Rural family doctors
require facilities and privileges to provide the needed services
for which they are trained and competent. Undue hardship on rural
communities may result from imposition by central regulatory authorities
of excessive certification or fellowship requirements for performing
procedures.
Overall health care delivery may be
improved by networking among doctors and sharing health care facilities
and professionals between several communities. There is a role
for government to ensure that the health system provides appropriate
physical facilities and services to meet the needs of rural and
remote communities.
For the rural family physician, there
is a major challenge in being the confidential medical adviser
in the consulting room and friend in the social and recreational
setting in the community. For doctors' spouses this may
be more difficult as members of the community will tend to treat
them differently because of the connection with the doctor.
In many ways, the rural practitioner's spouse may be more socially
isolated than the doctor. Consequently, there is a need for specific
strategies to provide personal support for doctors spouses. Also
spouses often have difficulty in obtaining employment and/or pursuing
career objectives. Strategies to meet these needs must be included.
For the doctor's family, there are difficulties
with education and subsequent employment. Strategies to assist
with educational support and funding for going away to pursue
education should be included in support programs for doctors'
families.
The long periods on-call with frequent
call outs lead to great family disruption such that there is a
need for longer than usual periods of recreation leave for rural
doctors and their families. Programs to assist must include appropriate
locum relief and financial assistance to permit recreation leave
away from the rural community.
Central government support is essential
to the provision of accessible health care particularly in rural
underserved areas. National governments need to develop and implement
effective national rural health strategies. This requires the
cooperation of communities, doctors and other health care professionals,
hospitals, medical schools, professional organisations, and governments.
Rural health care should be well resourced and funding mechanisms
should be developed which meet the needs of rural populations.
Establishment of National Rural Health Research Organisations
can facilitate this process.
WONCA believes there is an urgent need
to implement strategies to improve rural health services around
the world. In order to achieve this, there needs to be sufficient
numbers of skilled rural family doctors to provide the required
medical services. This document has outlined a series of key issues
of concern regarding training for rural practice.
It has been found that the production
of more and more doctors does not lead to an overflow of physicians
from the cities to the country. In order to increase the numbers
and quality of rural doctors it is necessary to implement a series
of strategies aimed at establishing an integrated career pathway
of education and training for rural practice. In the long term,
it is only this strategic approach which is likely to improve
the recruitment and retention of rural family physicians.
In order to achieve this goal, WONCA
recommends:
1. Increasing the number of medical students recruited from rural areas. Strategies may include:
1.1 Introduction of programs promoting medicine as a career to rural secondary students.
1.2 Establishment of scholarships and educational support programs which identify potential medical students in rural areas and assist them with secondary and tertiary education in preparation for medical school entry.
1.3 Selection processes that encourage admission of students from rural areas.
1.3.1 Selection processes including interviews should give specific recognition and credit for rural background, experience, and interest.
1.3.2 Specific targets for students from a rural background may be needed.
2. Substantial exposure to rural practice in the medical undergraduate curriculum. This may be achieved through:
2.1 Establishment of "Rural Practice Clubs" which encourage city origin students to develop an interest in rural practice and support rural background students in adjusting to the challenges of city living and university studies.
2.2 Rural doctor mentor schemes which provide rural origin students with ongoing personal support and encouragement from a nominated rural family physician.
2.3 An introduction to rural health issues early in the curriculum including specific rural practice attachments for students early in the medical course.
2.4 Block clinical rotations to rural hospitals and rural family practice later in the course.
2.5 A rural medicine stream for a selected group of students who indicate an early commitment to rural practice. This might take the form of:
2.5.1 One to three years of complete medical curriculum undertaken in the rural setting.
2.5.2 A thread of rural attachments intertwined through the clinical components of the curriculum.
2.6 Decentralised medical schools that allow students to take most or all of their medical school education in centres outside major metropolitan areas.
3. Specific flexible, integrated and coordinated rural practice vocational training programs. These programs should:
3.1 Be needs driven, evidence based, and learner centred
3.2 Have appropriate faculty, hospital, and financial support
3.3 Provide particular emphasis on training in procedural skills and an appropriate core curriculum on rural practice in addition to a solid family medicine foundation
3.4 Provide a major portion of training within the rural context
3.5 Provide the opportunity and funding for advanced rural skills training in emergency medicine, anaesthesia, surgery, procedural obstetrics and others.
3.6 Provide opportunities for regular family medicine trainees to experience the joys and challenges of rural family practice
4. Specific tailored continuing education and professional development programs whch meet the identified needs of rural family physicians.
4.1 Continuing medical education programs should be accessible to rural practitioners through locating them in rural regional centres and, where appropriate, making use of distance education methods including modern information technology.
4.2 Generally rural continuing medical education programs should be developed by rural doctors for rural doctors.
4.3 Development of appropriate university postgraduate diplomas and degrees available via distance education so as to allow more remote rural doctors to pursue higher university studies without leaving their towns or practices.
5. Appropriate academic positions, professional development and financial support for rural doctor-teachers to encourage rural health research and education.
5.1 Rural Medical Education and Research Centres should be established in rural areas with the aim of co-ordinating undergraduate education, postgraduate vocational training, and continuing medical education for rural practitioners. Such Centres greatly facilitate implementation of all previous recommendations. An important consequence of establishing Rural Medical Education and Research Centres is development of reciprocal links between country hospitals/practices and medical schools/teaching hospitals.
6. Medical schools should take responsibility to educate appropriately skilled doctors to meet the needs of their general geographic region including underserved areas and should play a key role in providing regional support for health professionals and accessible tertiary heath care.
7. Development of appropriate needs based and culturally sensitive rural health care resources with local community involvement, regional cooperation and government support.
7.1 Provide appropriate funding to develop and maintain hospital and other health services and referral resources to meet the needs of people in rural and remote communities.
7.2 Establish rural community health centres with facilities and support for doctors and other health professionals.
8. Improved professional and personal/family conditions in rural practice to promote retention of rural doctors. Strategies include:
8.1 Locum relief schemes should be established to permit release of rural family physicians to undertake continuing education as well as recreation and other forms of leave.
8.2 Targeted financial support for rural practice such as:
8.2.1 Funding models that provide security and flexibility for the doctor to and recognise the physician as a community resource.
8.2.2 Additional payments to rural practitioners in recognition of the higher level of clinical responsibility, services provided and on call demands.
8.2.3 Specific incentive payments for practicing in isolated/underserved areas
8.2.4 Financial assistance to maintain the economic viability of at least two doctors working together in a rural location.
8.2.5 Funding for travel and other costs for the doctor to attend continuing medical education.
8.3 Specific programs to meet the needs of rural doctors' spouses and families such as:
8.3.1 Spouse and family support networks.
8.3.2 Financial assistance with accommodation for the doctor and family.
8.3.3 Financial assistance to facilitate education of the doctor's family.
8.3.4 Funding to permit travel by the doctor and family for recreation and other forms of leave and to visit family members undertaking secondary or tertiary education.
8.3.5 Assistance in developing employment opportunities for the doctor's spouse.
9. Development and implementation of national rural health strategies with central government support. This requires:
9.1 Cooperative involvement of communities, doctors and other health care professionals, hospitals, medical schools, professional organisations, and governments at all levels. Establishment of national rural health research and education organisations can facilitate this process.
This WONCA Policy is based on experiences
in many countries around the world. The following list of references
highlights key issues:
1. Australian Health Ministers Conference.
National Rural Health Strategy. Australian Government Publishing
Service, Canberra, 1994.
2. Rural Undergraduate Steering Committee.
Rural Doctors: Reforming undergraduate medical education for
rural practice. Australian Commonwealth Department of Human
Services and Health. Australian Government Publishing Service,
Canberra, 1994.
3. Rural medicine design project. Training
curriculum surgery, anaesthesia and obstetrics for rural general
practice. Faculty of Rural Medicine, Royal Australian College
of General Practitioners, Sydney. 1992.
4. Association of American Medical Colleges.
Rural Health : A challenge for medical education. Proceedings
of 1990 invitational symposium. Academic Medicine 65: Supplement
1-126. 1990.
5. Littlemeyer M, Martin D. Academic
Initiatives to address physician supply in rural areas in the
United States : A compendium. Association of American Medical
Colleges, Washington, 1991.
6. American Academy of Family Physicians.
Rural Family Practice: You can make a difference. American
Academy of Family Physicians, Kansas City. 1989.
7. Canadian Medical Association. Report
of the advisory panel on the provision of medical services in
underserviced regions. Canadian Medical Association, Ottawa.
1992.
8. Blackwood R, McNab J. A portrait
of rural family practice: Problems and Priorities. College
of Family Physicians of Canada, Toronto. 1991.
9. Stiratanaban A and Sangprasert B.
The Rural Area Project (RAP) in Thailand: curriculum development.
Medical Education 17:374-377, 1983.
10. Carter R G. The relation between
personal characteristics of physicians and practice location in
Manitoba. CMAJ 136:366-368, 1987.
11. Asuzu M C. The influence of undergraduate
clinical training on the attitude of medical students to rural
medical practice in Nigeria. African Journal of Medicine &
Medical Sciences 18:245-250, 1989.
12. Poulose K P and Natarajan P K. Re-orientation
of medical education in India past, present and future. Indian
Journal of Public Health. 33:55-58, 1989.
13. Hickner J M. Training for rural
practice in Australia 1990. Medical Journal of Australia 154:111-118,
1991.
14. Rosenblatt R A, Whitcomb M E, Cullen
T J, Lishner D M and Hart L G. Which medical schools produce
rural physicians? JAMA 268:1559-1565, 1992.
15. Strasser R P. Attitudes of Victorian
rural general practitioners to country practice and training.
Australian Family Physician 21(7). 808-812, 1992.
16. Umland B, Waterman R, Wiese W, Duban
S, Mennin S and Kaufman A. Learning from a rural physician
program in China. Academic Medicine 67:307-309, 1992.
17. Magnus J H and Tollan A. Rural
doctor recruitment: does medical education in rural districts
recruit doctors to rural areas? Medical Education 25:250-253,
1993.
18. Gray J D, Steeves L C and Blackburn
J W. The Dalhousie University experience of training residents
in many small communities. Academic Medicine 69(10):847-851,
1994.
An extensive list of published articles
on education for rural practice has been collected, collated and
annotated by Dr James Rourke. This publication "Education
for rural practice: Goals and opportunities: An annotated bibliography",
is available at cost through the Australian Rural Health Research
Institute Moe, Victoria 3825 Australia.
27 March 1995
F:\USR\CRH\ADMIN\ROGER\WONCAPOL.DOC
SPK 6/9/95 3:48 PM